Security Value and Capability Economics
Apply FAIR, FAIR-CAM, and FAIR-MAM to quantify how security capabilities affect risk, material loss, avoided loss, and investment value.
Explore this service →The consulting problem
More analysis. Still no decision.
Organizations collect findings, scores, and recommendations while leaders still lack a quantified loss view, comparable protection economics, and a clear owner for residual risk.
The Marcriis offer system
Every engagement is anchored to a named decision and measurable outcome. Scope grows only when the decision requires it.
Material Cyber and AI Risk Diagnostic
Define the decision, authority, evidence plan, material scenarios, and readiness for quantitative analysis.
Frame the need →RDCD Material Risk to Protection Sprint
Quantify scenarios, compare genuine alternatives, engineer a protection strategy, and produce a decision ready for authorization.
See the method →AI Use Case Risk and Security Design
Determine whether to approve, restrict, redesign, monitor, or prohibit a consequential AI use case or small portfolio.
Frame an AI decision →Protection Capability Engineering
Translate selected treatments into architecture, capability performance, acceptance tests, implementation sequence, and lifecycle economics.
Define the protection decision →Risk Decision Office
Maintain the decision register, track conditions and triggers, review portfolio risk, and validate outcomes against the original decision basis.
Assess recurring governance →TRAINING + CAPACITY BUILDING
Explore training pathways →Make every engagement a capability transfer.
Pair consulting with executive labs, practitioner instruction, coached analysis, or train-the-practitioner pathways aligned to every RDCD step.
Choose by decision, not department
Start with what leadership must decide.
A short framing brief helps identify the right mix of risk analysis, value measurement, architecture, and capacity building.